| Symposiums |
|
|
|
Proposition de programme des sessions « psychiatrie »
SYMPOSIUMS LUNDBECK - Jeudi 4 septembre 2008
|
|
Session 1 : How to evaluate in mental health? |
| Chairman : Pr. Pierre Michel Llorca, Clermont-Ferrand |
Methods of evaluation in mental health and outcome measure
How to evaluate patient management in mental health?
Are evidence-based guidelines applicable to the field of psychiatry?
Experience from the French psychiatric health services integration
Should public and private psychiatric health care services be integrated?
Managed care in mental health: which lesson from the experience?
|
| |
Session 2 : Recueil et utilisation de l’information en santé mentale |
Chairman : Pr. Jean Michel Azorin, Marseille |
International experience in setting up claim data bases in psychiatry
International experience in the use of claim and prescription database in United-States and Europe
Experience of Lyon development of claim data base in psychiatry
Is experience of tracking patient path in somatic disorders applicable to psychiatry?
Use of remote medicine in psychiatry
Specificity of cost effectiveness assessment in psychiatry
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Medico-economic modeling and vaccination policy
SYMPOSIUM GSK - Vendredi 5 septembre 2008
|
|
| Introduction: Public Health and Vaccine Prevention |
| Pr. Jean-Pierre Daurès, specialist in Public Health, University Hospital Centre of Nîmes |
Need to extrapolate clinical outcomes beyond that observed in trials by economic modelling to be able to assess the impact of vaccination in real life.
|
| |
Examples of medico-economic models that contributed to Public Health Decision Makings: Rotavirus, Human Papillomavirus
The input of these models will be presented by experts in different fields (medico-economic expert, clinician)
|
| |
| Roundtable: |
| Moderator: Pr. Antoine Bailly |
Different point of views on the use and needs of medico-economic modelling on policy decisions:
- Institutional point of view: Health Authorities
- Clinician’s point of view
- Economist’s / Expert’s point of view |